Nizhny Novgorod Muslim Tatars in the regional dimension (methodological aspect)

Senyutkina O.N.

520-531 p.


doi.org: https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2024-9-4.520-531
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EVIIIT


Abstract. The author of the article explores methodological approaches to the study of Nizhny Novgorod Muslim Tatars, which found application in the works of predecessors or those that are still awaiting testing. In this case, a microsection of the Nizhny Novgorod sociocultural space is used. Particular attention in the article is drawn to the conceptual apparatus of describing the history of the Mishars, identifying the specific features of the Mishar subethnic group of the Tatar nation and the role of the state in creating turning points in the history of this community. The author shows that one of the research angles for studying the history of Muslims (including the Russian Tatar-Muslim world) may be believers’ place of residence, their localisation. The use of the regional dimension when writing the history of Russia’s Tatars is completely justified, if for no other reason than that specific features have historically developed in the process of development of individual subethnic groups of the Tatar people (Siberian Tatars, Crimean Tatars, etc.). Using the example of the history of the Nizhny Novgorod Region Tatars, the author proves the advantages of using such a principle as interdisciplinarity, considering it possible to apply individual elements of certain methodologies to understanding ethnicity in the optics of historical ethnology. The author draws attention to another important research problem – the significance of regional specifics, both in studying the structure and self-awareness of the autochthonous peoples of Russia in their subethnic context, and, related to this, the regional specifics of a multi-ethnic and multi-confessional state, that is the Russian Federation. The materials of the article allow us to speak about the relevance of the topic chosen by the author, since the overall ethnic picture of Russia consists of individual regional “strokes”.


Keywords: Islam, society, Nizhny Novgorod Muslim Tatars, methodology, post-secularity, optics of narrative.

For citation: Senyutkina O.N. (2024) Nizhny Novgorod Muslim Tatars in the regional dimension (methodological aspect). Istoricheskaya etnologiya [Historical Ethnology]. Vol. 9. No. 4: 520–531. https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2024-9-4.520-531 (In Russ.)


REFERENCES

Bessmertnaya O. (2023) “Intertwined history” and/or “decolonisation” of historical research? Gosudarstvo, religiya i tserkov’ v Rossi i zarubezhom [State, religion and church in Russia and abroad]. No. 3–4 [41]: 14–32. (In Russ.)
Van den Akker Robin (2019) Metamodernism. Historicity, Affect and Depth after postmodernism.: Ripol-Classic Publishing house. URL: https://psv4.userapi.com/c856232/u59859230/docs/d16/dda3e41eb63a/Robin_van_den (accessed: 22.04.2024). (In Russ.)
Guseva Yu.N., Senyutkina O.N., Khristoforov V.S. (2021) It is possible to understand and imagine Islam… (the image of Islam in the minds of Russians from the 1880s to the 1920s). Moscow: Medina Publ. (In Russ.)
Elchinova G.I., Vasilyeva T.A., Elkanova L.A., Zinchenko R.A. (2013) Mishar Tatars: Population genetic characteristics. Zhivye i biokosnye sistemy [Living and bioinert systems]. No. 3: 15–24. (In Russ.)
Red Island and its history (2023) Moscow: TDDS-Capital-8 Publ. (In Russ.)
Senyutkin S.B. (2009) History of the Tatars of the Nizhny Novgorod Volga region from the last third of the 16th century to the early 20th century. (The historical fate of the Mishars of the Nizhny Novgorod region). N. Novgorod: NNGU edition; reissue (2021): Moscow – N. Novgorod: Medina Publ. (In Russ.)
Senyutkina O.N. (1994) Educational and methodological study guide for the History of Civilizations course. Nizhniy Novgorod: NGLU Publ. (In Russ.)
Tishkov V.A. (1997) Essays on the theory of ethnicity and the politics of ethnicity in Russia. Moscow. (In Russ.)
Tlostanova M.V. (2009) Decolonising humanities knowledge. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya Filosofiya [Bulletin of RUDN University. Philosophy Series]. No. 1: 5–14. (In Russ.)
Tlostanova M. (2020) Post-colonial hedgehog’s destiny and decolonial hedgehog’s choice: post-socialist mediation. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New literary review]. No.1 (161): 66–84. (In Russ.)
Fukuyama F. (1990) The end of history? Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy]. No. 3: 84–118. (In Russ.)
Khakimov R.S. (2016) Perspectives of historical ethnology. Istoricheskaya etnologiya [Historical ethnology]. Vol. 1. No. 1: 8–23. (In Russ.)
 

About the author: Olga N. Senyutkina, Doctor Sc. (History), Professor at the Department of History and World Politics, Head of the International Research Laboratory “Historical Comparatistics, Regional Studies and Development of East Asian Territories”, Nizhny Novgorod Dobrolyubov State Linguistic University (31a Minin St., Nizhny Novgorod 603455, Russian Federation); https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0649-7295; e-mail: senutkina@mail.ru


Received 24.04.2024 Revised 10.07.2024   Accepted for publication 13.08.2024

Published Online 28.08.2024