472-490 p.

Download the article

doi.org: https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2025-10-3.472-490
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XUUSWJ

Abstract. The article analyzes the use of the Tatar language by residents of the five largest cities of Tatarstan (Kazan, Naberezhnye Chelny, Nizhnekamsk, Almetyevsk, and Zelenodolsk) in interpersonal communication and in various institutions and urban public environments. It is based on the data of a mass-scale ethno-sociological survey conducted in late 2024 – early 2025. In the course of integrating the data, the authors sought to use certain new approaches to the analysis of ethnolinguistic processes – by posing the question of the choice of the language of communication not only in connection with the respondents’ belonging to a particular ethnic group, but also in relation to the environment and situation of communication, socio-cultural practices and expectations. The study showed that the Tatar language is chosen significantly more often in the private life of city residents and to a lesser extent in their public life. Nevertheless, in the social and institutional sphere it is noticed to one degree or another (“constantly” and “sometimes”) by about 90% of city residents. The Tatar language is used slightly less in educational institutions, somewhat more in administrative and medical institutions, and it is heard noticeably more frequently in public spaces of cities. In all spheres of interpersonal communication, the Russian language is predominant among the Russian settlements under examination. Tatar-Russian bilingualism or Tatar monolingualism prevails among Tatars. Two languages are used by 60–80% of Tatars in friendly communication, half in business, as well as when talking with parents, spouses, grandparents, and a third when they address their brothers and sisters. 75–96% of respondents recognize the importance of the representation of the Tatar language in the socio-cultural space of their cities. However, when assessing the real situation, from a fifth to a third of Tatars in different settlements pointed out the insufficiency of its presence. The identified public demand for the Tatar language, its perception as an organic part of the urban landscape by a significant proportion of representatives of different nationalities, demonstrates the significant role of this language in interpersonal communication and in the socio-cultural development of large cities in Tatarstan.

Keywords: Tatar language, linguistic behavior, interpersonal communication, choice of language of communication, urban public spaces, Tatarstan

For citation: Gabdrakhmanova G.F., Makarova G.I. (2025) The Tatar language in interpersonal communication and public spaces of Tatarstan cities. Istoricheskaya etnologiya [Historical Ethnology]. Vol. 10. No. 3: 472–490. https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2025-10-3.472-490 (In Russ.)

REFERENCES

Arutyunova E.M. (2024) The city as a factor: the linguistic situation and perception of the problems of ethnic languages in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). Istoricheskaya etnologiya [Historical Ethnology]. Vol. 9. No. 3: 458–473. https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2024-9-3.458-473 (In Russ.)
Danilov I.A., Ivanova N.I. (2023) Language distribution of urban everyday life in Sakha: sociolinguistic dimension (according to the data from 2021). Novye issledovaniya Tuvy [The New Research of Tuva]. No. 4: 301–313. https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2023.4.21 (In Russ.)
Danilov I.A. (2024) The Sakha language in a northern industrial monotown: Linguistic distribution in speech repertoire of Sakha People. Nauchnyy dialog [Scientific Dialogue]. No 13(5): 48–66. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-5-48-66 (In Russ.)
Fishman J. (2012) Who Speaks What Language, with Whom, and When? In: Sociolinguistics and Sociology of Language. Reader / [translated from English]; reprinted by N.B. Bakhtin. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the European University at St. Petersburg: 63–83. (In Russ.)
Gabdrakhmanova G.F. (2023a) Language landscape of a Russian city: socio-humanitarian approaches to its study. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No 2: 72–82. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250021396-8 (In Russ.)
Gabdrakhmanova G.F. (2023b) Institutionalization of the Russian national school in the field of politics (the case of Sakha and Tatar-speaking schools of the Republics of Sakha (Yakutia) and Tatarstan). POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya [POLIS. Political Studies]. No 3: 98–113. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.03.08 (In Russ.)
Gallyamov R.R. (1997) Bilingualism in the cities of Bashkortostan. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No 8: 49–55. (In Russ.)
Garipov Ya.Z. (2017) Ethnolinguistic processes in a multinational Russian region: development trends and features of social design (the case of the Republic of Tatarstan). Diss. … Doctor Sociol. Sciences. Ufa. (In Russ.)
Guboglo M.N. (1998) Languages of ethnic mobilization. Moscow. (In Russ.)
Iskhakova Z.A. (1999) Linguistic orientation of the Tatar and Russian urban population of the Republic of Tatarstan. In: Language policy in the Republic of Tatarstan. Documents and materials (80–90s). Kazan: Magarif Publ.: 293–303. (In Russ.)
Ivanov V.V. (2021) The Buryat language in the linguistic landscape and language practices in Ulan-Ude. Sotsiolingvistika [Sociolinguistics]. No. 1 (5): 147–163. https://doi.org/10.37892/2713-2951-2021-1-5-147-163 (In Russ.)
Kazarinova N.V. (2017) Interpersonal communication: from the history of ideas. Diskurs [Discourse]. No. 1: 114–122. (In Russ.)
Khaliulina, A.I., Idrisova, E.F. (2022) Preservation of native languages among minority nationalities in a multiethnic Russian region (the case of the Chuvash population in Bashkortostan). Sociolingvistika [Sociolinguistics]. No. 1 (9): 37–46. https://doi.org/10.37892/2713-2951-1-9-37-46 (In Russ.)
Lappo G.M. (1997) Geography of cities: Textbook for geographic faculties of universities. Moscow: Gumanit. izd. tsentr VLADOS Publ. (In Russ.)
Makarova G.I. (2010) Identities of Tatars and Russians in the context of ethnocultural policy of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Tatarstan. Kazan. (In Russ.)
Mikhalichenko V.Yu. (2000) Languages of the Russian Federation and the New Abroad: status and functions. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ. (In Russ.)
Mukharyamova L.M. (2003) Language relations: political science analysis. Kazan: Kazan University Publ. (In Russ.)
Safin F.G., Idrisova E.F. Ethnolinguistic orientations of youth in Bashkortostan (according to ethnosociological survey data). Sotsiolingvistika [Sociolinguistics]. No. 1(9): 24–36. https://doi.org/10.37892/2713-2951-1-9-24-36 (In Russ.)
Shabykov V.I., Solovyov E.V. (2019) The influence of urbanization on the dynamics of linguistic behavior of Russian ethnic groups in the Republic of Mari El. Poisk: Politika. Obshchestvovedenie. Iskusstvo. Sotsiologiya. Kul’tura: nauchnyy i sotsiokul’turnyy zhurnal [Search: Politics. Social studies. Art. Sociology. Culture: a scientific and sociocultural journal]. No. 4 (75): 42–51. (In Russ.)
Shakhbanova M. (2022) Linguistic consciousness of the urban population of Dagestan. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski [State and Municipal Administration. Scholar Notes]. No. 1: 269–275. (In Russ.)
State languages of the Republic of Tatarstan: multiple dimensions. A collection of essays (2016) Eds. G.F. Gabdrakhmanova, G.I. Makarova, A.R. Mukhametzyanova. Kazan: Marjani Institute of History of the Tatarstan Academy of Sciences Publ. (In Russ.)
Turkic languages in the context of globalization (sociological analysis of the Tatar language). (2011). Eds. Gabdrakhmanova G.F., Iskhakova Z.A., Musina R.N. Astana: Kantana-press Publ. (In Russ.)
Valeeva A.F. (2002) The influence of urbanization on the linguistic behavior of residents of a multiethnic region. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 8: 40–49. (In Russ.)
Yanush O.B., Mukharyamov N.M., Mukharyamova L.M. (2020) Language policy in theoretical contexts of neo-institutionalism. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political Linguistics]. No 6: 156–165. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26170/pl20-06-17 (In Russ.)
 

About the authors: Gulnara F. Gabdrakhmanova, Dr. Sc. (Sociology), Head of the Department of Ethnological Research, Marjani Institute of History of the Tatarstan Academy of Sciences (7 Baturin St., Kazan, 420111, Russian Federation); https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1796-5234; e-mail: medi54375@mail.ru
Guzel I. Makarova, Dr. Sc. (Sociology), Chief Researcher of the Department of Ethnological Research, Marjani Institute of History of the Tatarstan Academy of Sciences (7 Baturin St., Kazan 420111, Russian Federation); https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3912-0961; e-mail: makarova_guzel@mail.ru

Received 28.02.2025 Revised 9.04.2025   Accepted for publication 23.04.2025

Published Online 01.09.2025