Ethnocultural practices and interethnic attitudes of the Kostanay region Tatars in the Republic of Kazakhstan

Makhmutov Z.A.

131-151 p.


doi.org: https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2026-11-1.131-151
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SHHEXM


Abstract. The article examines ethnocultural practices and interethnic attitudes of the Tatar population of the Kostanay region in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The study is based on a wide range of sources, including archival documents, periodical publications, and data from an ethno-sociological study (mass surveys and in-depth interviews). The research has demonstrated that despite the closure of all mosques during the Soviet period, the persecution of Muslim clergy, and the implementation of state anti-religious campaigns, Tatars continued to maintain religiously rooted ethnocultural traditions. They preserved national rites associated with Islam and continued to celebrate major religious holidays, such as Kurban Bayram and Uraza Bayram. Among non-religious practices, the collective ritual kaz ömäse held a particularly significant place. Until approximately the 1970s, various traditional practices remained widespread, including collective women’s gatherings (aulak öy), rituals of going out into the steppe (dalaga chygu), matchmaking customs, and ceremonies associated with introducing the bride to the path leading to a water source. During the period of ethnic renaissance (the late 1980s and early 1990s), the Tatar community of the region succeeded in establishing a national cultural center, as well as were able to create musical ensembles, broadcast informational radio programs, and organize the native language classes for children. Since 1994, the cultural center has annually organized the Sabantuy festival and other ethnocultural events. At present, the study records a noticeable decline in ethnocultural competence, manifested in weaker knowledge of the native language, folklore, and family rituals among the younger generation. At the same time, interethnic relations in the region are characterized by a high level of ethnic tolerance. The factors influencing interethnic attitudes include assimilation processes and the policy of personnel indigenization.


Keywords: Tatars; Kazakhstan; Kostanay region; ethnocultural practices; interethnic interaction; traditions; customs; language competence

For citation: Makhmutov Z.A. (2026). Ethnocultural practices and interethnic attitudes of the Kostanay region Tatars in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Istoricheskaya etnologiya [Historical Ethnology]. Vol. 11. No. 1: 131–151. https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2026-11-1.131-151 (In Russ.)
Acknowledgments. The publication was prepared according to the state assignment No. 0599-2019-0043 “The problem of deviant behavior in the system of modern human science”. The author expresses gratitude to Rais Ravilievich Yaushev for his assistance in conducting the research.


REFERENCES

Berry J.W. (1997) Acculturation and adaptation. In: Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon: 291–306.
Drobizheva L.M. (2002) Russian and ethnic identity: confrontation or compatibility. In: Drobizheva L.M. (ed.) Reforming Russia. Moscow: Academia Publ.: 214–227. (In Russ.)
Eshment B. (1999) Problems of Russians in Kazakhstan: ethnicity or politics? Diaspory [Diasporas]. No. 2–3: 169–186. (In Russ.)
Khakimova T.R. (2013) Folk pedagogy and the Tatar school. In: Tatars and Bashkirs of the Kostanay Region: National Unity of Kazakhstan in Diversity. Kostanay: 72–88. (In Russ.)
Kostanay – Kostanay: Essays on History from Ancient Times to 1936 (2012). Ternovoy I.K. (ed.) Kostanay. (In Russ.)
Kostanay – Kostanay: Essays on History (1936–2013) (2012). Ternovoy I.K. (ed.) Kostanay. (In Russ.)
Kurganskaya V.D., Dunaev V.Yu. (2002) Kazakhstan Model of Interethnic Integration. Almaty. (In Russ.)
Makhmutov Z.A. (2022) History of the Tatars of Kostanay and the Kostanay Region. Voronezh: Champion LLC Publ. (In Russ.)
Mukhsinova Z.G. (2013) From the history of the Tatar diaspora in the Kostanay region. In: Tatars and Bashkirs of the Kostanay Region: National Unity of Kazakhstan in Diversity. Kostanay: 3–17. (In Russ.)
Panarin S.A. (1999) Russian-speaking populations beyond Russia’s borders: challenges and responses (the case of Kazakhstan). Diaspory [Diasporas]. No. 2–3: 136–168. (In Russ.)
Skutnabb-Kangas T., McCarty T.L. (2008) Key concepts in bilingual education: ideological, historical, epistemological, and empirical foundations. In: Encyclopedia of Language and Education. New York: Springer: 3–17.
Vostrikov Ya.V. (1959) Some issues of Komsomol activity in the period 1920–1922. In: The First Steps of Kostanay Komsomol Members. Kostanay: 35–40. (In Russ.)
 

About the author: Zufar A. Makhmutov, Doctor Sc. (History), Leading Researcher, Kazan Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Federal Scientific Center for Psychological and Interdisciplinary Research” (12 Isaev St., Kazan 420039, Russian Federation); https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-4061; e-mail: zufar@inbox.ru


Received 03.10.2025 Revised 17.11.2025   Accepted for publication 03.12.2025

Published Online 02.03.2026