101-115 p.

Download the article

doi.org: https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2026-11-1.101-115
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WXYUUC

Abstract. This article is intended as a polemical essay. The presented points have two main objectives. The first one is to outline the areas of agreement and scholarly disagreement between the author and the ideas of renowned ethnosociologist Rogers Brubaker, expressed in his 2017 article on two types of political identity (nationalist and civilizational). The paper argues with the American sociologist that civilizationalism is supposedly displacing nationalism in the political strategy of right-wing populists in Europe. The author is even more dubious about attempts to equate the civilizational ideology of European right-wing populists with the civilizational ideas of Russian right-wing forces. From the author’s point of view, such an equation is inconsistent with reality and fails to take into account Russia’s historical and cultural characteristics. Secondly, the article is motivated by the author’s desire to remind the ethnosociological community of a number of important theoretical and methodological propositions by L.M. Drobizheva regarding the particular aspects of civic and state identification in Russia and the differences between Russian principles of such identification and those that developed within Western political culture. The distinguished Russian sociologist and ethnologist’s ideas are extremely relevant in the context of contemporary discussions about the specifics of civilizational identification in Russia and the West.

Keywords: national identity; civic identity; state identity; populism; nationalism; civilizationalism

For citation: Pain E.A. (2026) On national and civilizational identification: polemical notes on R. Brubaker’s concept, drawing on the ideas of L.M. Drobizheva. Istoricheskaya etnologiya [Historical Ethnology]. Vol. 11. No. 1: 101–115. https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2026-11-1.101-115 (In Russ.)

REFERENCES

Alekseenkova E.S. (2022) Transformation of right-wing populism in Italy 2018–2022: From sovereignism to patriotism. Sovremennaya Yevropa [Modern Europe]. No. 7: 42–56. https://doi.org/10.31857/S020170832207004X (In Russ.)
Brubaker R. (2017) Between nationalism and civilizationism: the European populist moment in comparative perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies. No 40 (8): 1191–1226.
Bulatov M.R. (2024) Rhetoric of far-right parties in Russia and Germany: a comparative discourse analysis. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya [Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Sociology]. Vol. 17. No. 1: 33–46. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2024.103 (In Russ.)
Drobizheva L.M. (2006) State and ethnic identity: choice and mobility. In: Civil, Ethnic, and Religious Identities in Contemporary Russia. Magun V.S. (ed.) Moscow: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ.: 10–29. (In Russ.)
Hosking G. (2016) “Why Has Nationalism Revived in Europe?”. Nations and Nationalism. No. 2 (22): 212– 219.
Krasikova L.V. (2022) Transformation of euroscepticism of the national unification party (2017–2022). Analysis and Forecast. Zhurnal IMEMO RAN [Journal of IMEMO RAS]. No. 3: 91–103. https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2022-391-103 (In Russ.)
Malofeev K.V. (2022) Empire. Image of the Future. Moscow: AST Publ. (In Russ.)
Mudde C. (2004) “The Populist Zeitgeist”. Government and Opposition. No. 39 (4): 541–563.
Oskolkov P.V. (2019) Right-Wing Populism in the European Union. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Pain E.A. (2004) Ethnopolitical Pendulum. Dynamics and Mechanisms of Ethnopolitical Processes in Post-Soviet Russia. Moscow: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)
Pain E.A. (2025) “Whites,” “Reds,” “Greens”: the ideological and ethnoconfessional diversity of modern Russian conservatism (based on a content analysis of Telegram channels). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 40–53. https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034601025030042 (In Russ.)
Sabanskiy V.A. (2023) Analysis of the activity of right-wing populist parties on Twitter. In: Digital Leviathan: Transformation of the State, Society and Institutions in the Era of Digitalization. Minsk, February 20. URL: http://edoc.bseu.by:8080/bitstream/edoc/98737/1/Sabanskiy_84_88.pdf (In Russ.)
 

About the author: Emil A. Pain, Doctor Sc. (Political Science), Cand. Sc. (History), Leading Researcher, Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (24/35, building 5 Krzhizhanovskiy St., Moscow 117218, Russian Federation); https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8796-187X; e-mail: pinea@mail.ru

Received 31.10.2025 Revised 01.12.2025   Accepted for publication 15.12.2025

Published Online 02.03.2026