235-251 p.

Download the article

doi.org: https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2026-11-2.235-251
EDN: BGRFLR

Abstract. The article disputes the theoretical constructs of sociologist Evgeniy Varshaver who studies ethnic phenomena. He claims that ethnical phenomena are constructed around ethnical categories and it is necessary to study the processes of categorization in order to comprehend these phenomena. Varshaver links his theoretical position to the cognitive turn in science. In line with radical constructivism, he believes that the cognitive turn consists of breaking with social groups as ontological objects and suggests focusing entirely on the study of categorization processes. However, there are other positions in social psychology and sociology that are critical of such a separation of mental operations from the social and historical practice. The weak point of Varshaver’s concept is its reliance on Thomas Kuhn’s concept of paradigms, which is poorly adapted to the social sciences and is outdated in a number of respects. Another weakness of Varshaver’s viewpoint is the separation of theories of ethnicity from the context in which they originated, and the failure to understand the connection between these theories and general sociological theories, as well as their philosophical roots. A more specific issue is affiliation with ethnic categories. Varshaver relies here on political scholar Kanchan Chandra, who believes that there is no reason to separate ethnic identity from other identities based on origin. Therefore, she classifies people united on different grounds as ethnic groups. Thus, Chandra, and following her, Varshaver, blur the understanding of ethnicity as related to groups in which the descendants of intra-group marriages have a stable identity, regardless of class, religious, social or other forms of identity, which can also be inherited, but are subject to changes in the first generation of descendants from intra-group marriages when they move to another social status, religious affiliation, class and other social commonalities.

Keywords: Evgeny Varshaver; ethnicity; constructivism; Kanchan Chandra; cognitive turn; social groups

For citation: Wiener B.E. (2026) Constructivist reductionism by Evgeny Varshaver: where does his cognitive turn in the study of ethnicity take us? Istoricheskaya etnologiya [Historical Ethnology]. Vol. 11. No. 2: 235–251. https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2026-11-2.235-251 (In Russ.)

REFERENCES

Akintoye S.A. (2014) A History of the Yoruba People. Dakar: Amalion Publishing, 2014.
Barnard A. (2000) History and Theory in Anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Barrett S.R. (1984) The Rebirth of Anthropological Theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Berzina M.Ya. (1971) Formation of the Ethnic composition of the Canadian Population. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
Bourdieu P. (1994) First principles. Moscow: Socio-Logos Publ. (In Russ.)
Brubaker R. (2012) Ethnicity without Groups. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola Ekonomiki Publ. (In Russ.) (In Russ.)
Chandra K. (2006) What is ethnic identity and does it matter? Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 9: 397–424. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170715
Cohen A. (1974) The lesson of ethnicity. In: A. Cohen (ed.) Urban Ethnicity. London: Tavistock Publications: xi-xxiv.
Cushman P., Gergen K.J., Smith A. Jr. (2020) Edward E.Sampson (1934–2019). American Psychologist. Vol.75. No.3: 413. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/amp0000602
DiMaggio P. (1997) Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 23: 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263
Dogan M. (1999) Political science and the other social sciences. In P.Goodin, H.-D. Klingemann (eds). Political Science: New Directions. Moscow: Veche Publ.: 113–146. (In Russ.)
Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: the Social Organization of Culture Difference (2006) F. Barth (ed.). Moscow: Novoe Izdatelʹstvo Publ. (In Russ.)
Falola T. (2006) The Yorùbá nation. In: Yorùbá Identity and Power Politics. T.Falola, A.Genova (eds). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press: 29–48.
Ghosh Roy K., Mr. (2020) The Origin and Development of the unique Political Phenomenon named ‘Other Backward Classes’ and its role in reshaping the Post-Independence National Politics in India: a perspective from an Anthropologist. Preprints / SocArXiv / 4rtah_v1. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4rtah
Glazer N., Moynihan D.P. (1975) Introduction. In: Ethnicity: Theory and Experience. N. Glazer, D.P. Moynihan (eds). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press: 1–26.
Granin Yu.D. (2014) On the problem of reality in modern sociology: the disappearance of the “group”? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No.2: 126–130. EDN RVKMXV (In Russ.)
Hale H.E. (2004) Explaining ethnicity. Comparative Political Studies. Vol. 37. No.4: 458–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414003262906
Hamilton M.B. (2009) Population Genetics. Chichester, UK; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Inge-Vechtomov S.G. (1989) Genetics with the basics of breeding. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola Publ. (In Russ.)
Kuhn T. (2009) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Moscow: AST: AST Moscow Publ. (In Russ.)
Lakatos I. (2008) Selected Works on Philosophy and Methodology of Science. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt; Triksta Publ. (In Russ.)
Mullins N.C. (1973) Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. New York Harper & Row.
Pain E.A. (2023) Constructivism and primordialism: complementary methodologies in ethnology and sociology. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennostʹ [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. No.4: 53–67. https://doi.org/ 10.31857/S0869049923040032 (In Russ.)
Renn J. (2020) The Evolution of Knowledge: Rethinking Science for the Anthropocene. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Ritzer G. (2002) Modern Soсiological Theory. 5th ed. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.)
Sagitova L.V., Garifullin I.Z. (2025) Tatars and state national policy in Bashkortostan in the 20th – early 21st centuries: the population census aspect. Istoricheskaya etnologiya [Historical Ethnology]. Vol. 10. No. 3: 453–471. https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2025-10-3.453-471 EDN: WJZDJW (In Russ.)
Sampson E.E. (1981) Cognitive psychology as ideology. American Psychologist. Vol.36. No.7: 730–743. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.7.730
Sibeon R. (2004) Rethinking Social Theory. London: SAGE Publications.
Sneath D. (2018) From transactionalism to practice theory. In: Schools and Styles of Anthropological Theory. M. Candea (ed.) London & New York: Routledge: 91–107.
Tentchoff D. (1980) Ethnic survival under Anglo-American hegemony: the Louisiana Cajuns. Anthropological Quarterly. Vol. 53. No. 4: 229–241.
Van den Berghe P.L. (1990) From the Popocatepetl to the Limpopo. In: Authors of Their Own Lives: Intellectual Autobiographies by Twenty American Sociologists. B.M. Berger (ed.) Berkeley, CA: University of California Press: 410–431.
Varshaver E. (2022) “Stop beating the dead primordial horse”: actual agendas in the constructivist research of ethnicity. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Russian Sociological Review]. Vol. 21. No. 3: 31–58. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2022-3-31-58 (In Russ.)
Varshaver E.A. (2016) Ethnic boundaries in local communities: theoretical and methodological analysis: Diss. Cand. Sociol. Sciences. Moscow. (In Russ.)
Varshaver E.A. (2023а) Integration of migrants through the lens of a constructivist approach to ethnicity. Vesnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Politologiya [RUDN Journal of Political Science]. Vol. 25. No. 2: 377–396. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2023-25-2-377-396 EDN: XICTAA (In Russ.)
Varshaver E.A. (2023б) The census through the lens of a constructivist approach to ethnicity. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie [Ethnographic Review]. No. 4: 219–224. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869541523040097 EDN: HJPWNK (In Russ.)
Varshaver E.A. (2024) What exactly is studied when ethnicity is researched? A descriptive model for constructivist studies of ethnicity in the context of the cognitive turn. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Russian Sociological Review]. Vol. 23. No. 3: 94–126. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2024-3-94-126 (In Russ.)
Varshaver E.A. (2025) Evolutionary cognitive science as a resource for explaining ethnic phenomena “after the cognitive turn”. Puti Rossii [The Ways of Russia]. Vol. 3. No. 1: 9–41. (In Russ.)
Wallace R., Wolf A. (1995) Contemporary Sociological Theory: Continuing the Classical Tradition. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Wiener B.E. (1998) Ethnicity: in search of a paradigm for study. Etnographicheskoe obozrenie [Ethnographic Review]. No. 4: 3–26. (In Russ.)
Wiener B.E. (2025) A critical look at Rogers Brubaker’s cognitive constructivism. Sotsialʹnyei gumanitarnye znaniya [Social and Humanitarian Knowledge]. Vol. 11. No. 3: 246–257. https://doi.org/10.18255/2412-6519-2025-3-246-257 (In Russ.)
Zavyalova M.P. (2012) Cognitive “turn” in science and philosophy. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosophiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science]. No. 2 (18): 5–12. (In Russ.)
 

About the author: Boris E. Wiener, Cand. Sc. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Senior Research Fellow at the Department for History of Russian Sociology, Sociological Institute of the RAS – Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (25/14 7th Krasnoarmeyskaya St., St. Petersburg 190005, Russian Federation); https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9319-0250; e-mail: wienerras@yandex.ru

Received 25.12.2025 Revised 18.03.2026   Accepted for publication 24.03.2026

Published Online 08.06.2026